Recognize the text below or something like it?
The following statement is required by IRS regulations (31 CFR Part 10, §10.35): Any tax advice contained in this material (including any attachments or referred material) was not intended, or written to be used, and cannot be used by you or any other person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
It, or something very like it, has been a part of virtually every business email, letter, and presentation rendered after June 20, 2005, that is written by lawyers and CPAs as well as financial professionals.
Well, no more. The IRS says Circular 230 is no longer necessary -- but it does so in sort of a grumpy way.
“I’m here to tell you to get that jurat ¹, that disclaimer, off your e-mails. It’s no longer necessary. I just don’t want you blaming all that extra garbage at the end of your e-mails on the Internal Revenue Service or the Office of Professional Responsibility,” said Karen L. Hawkins, Director of IRS Office of Professional Responsibility, to practitioners at a June 20 tax conference sponsored by the New York University School of Continuing and Professional Studies in New York.
The IRS’s chief counsel, William J. Wilkins, seconded Ms. Hawkins statement more politely, telling practitioners in a keynote address that the “Circular 230 legend is not merely dead, it’s really most sincerely dead. So please omit.”
What apparently ticked the IRS off was the underlined portion above which, while not required, was often added to indicate that the IRS is responsible for requiring the Circular 230 disclosure. Programmed by most to appear automatically, Circular 230 appears so often in so many unrelated places (e.g., e-mails to Mom and Dad, social media posts), it’s kind of like bird poop on your roof -- largely ignored by all.
So, as advised by Mr. Wilkins, “. . . it’s really most sincerely dead. So please omit.”
Note: The IRS says that elimination of the Circular 230 disclaimer will save practitioners and their clients at least $5,333,200. That’s a pretty precise number, but there is nothing provided by the IRS to back it up. That’s kind of hard to believe though -- it took us all of 20 seconds to remove it from InsMark’s email master. How clients can benefit financially because their advisers have eliminated the disclaimer is beyond me. My guess is it’s probably fluff to make the withdrawal look like a generous benefit extended by the IRS. (You think?)
¹ Jurat: The certificate of an officer that a written instrument was sworn to by the individual who signed it.
We hope to see you at the 2015 InsMark Symposium scheduled for March 27 - 28, 2015, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Lots of great InsMark concepts and some terrific guest speakers as well. Attendees tell us it is consistently the best sales and marketing meeting they attend all year, including the MDRT, COT, TOT, and Forum 400. Contact Julie Nayeri at 1-888-InsMark (467-6275) or email@example.com to register for the Symposium, or click here to view the Agenda and register online.
“I have been in the business 30 years and have attended InsMark Symposium for over 20 years. Each one gives me at least 2-3 impact ideas that I can immediately take back and have impact for me and my clients. It is fun and always the best conference I attend annually.”
Chris Jacob, CFP, InsMark Platinum Power Producer®, SFI-Cadeau, St. Louis, MO
“InsMark helps us help our clients understand their money and their choices. At every InsMark seminar -- especially the Symposium -- I learn something new that changes what we do and how we can do it more efficiently. That translates to a better bottom line for us and for our clients. It’s making more money for everyone -- just by pushing InsMark buttons on the computer. I wouldn’t miss a Symposium.”
Kay Corbin, CLU, ChFC InsMark Platinum Power Producer®, Phoenix, AZ
More Recent Blogs:
|3 Reasons Why It’s Profitable For You To Share These|
|Blog Posts With Your Business Associates and|
|Professional Study Groups (i.e. “LinkedIn”)|