Blog #40: Leveraged Deferred Compensation

(Presentations were created using the InsMark Illustration System, Leveraged Compensation System and Cloud-Based Documents On A Disk.)

Getting Started with InsMark Training Video

Bob Ritter's Blog #40 Leveraged Deferred Compensation image

InsMark's Advanced Consulting Group (ACG) highfive with puppy and girl image
InsMark's Advanced Consulting Group click here to receive more information
spacer image

Editor’s Note: Once in a while, Bob will go deeply into an advanced subject on his Blog, and this is one of them. If you have clients who are senior executives with tax exempt organizations like hospitals, colleges and universities, and large charitable organizations, be sure to study this Blog. Otherwise, skip it unless you want to break into this market. If you do see a place for Leveraged Deferred Compensation in your practice, be certain to obtain the approval of a client’s legal and tax advisers regarding its applicability.

In the last few Blogs (Blog #36, Blog #37, Blog #38, and Blog #39), we have been examining Indexed Universal Life (IUL) in a Case Study involving Elizabeth Rand, MD, age 40. All that has led up to this Blog where she is illustrated using her IUL policy to fund an unusual deferred compensation plan.

Dr. Rand is a Board Certified orthopedic surgeon specializing in sports injuries. She is in negotiations with Bay Area Medical Center (“BAMC”) to merge her practice with the hospital. Her compensation package is in the high six figures, and she and BAMC are examining ways for her to defer $100,000 a year for five years with the payback in a lump sum at her age 60.

Deferred compensation funded with corporate-owned life insurance is an alternative, but Dr. Rand does not like: 1) its lack of any pre-retirement vesting and 2) that its typical annual retirement benefit is taxed as ordinary income.

InsMark’s Leveraged Deferred Compensation (“LDC”) may provide the answer.

Click here for tax comments involving deferred compensation plans between hospitals and doctors.

With LDC, Dr. Rand agrees to the $100,000 reduction in compensation in each of the next five years. BAMC agrees to extend a loan to her for $100,000 in those same years using loan regime split dollar as authorized by the 2003 Final Split Dollar Regulations issued by the Treasury Department.

Click here for comments on severance arrangements and tax exempt organizations.

BAMC also agrees to enter into a severance agreement with Dr. Rand whereby she will be repaid her $500,000 compensation reduction at her retirement (or earlier should she die or become disabled). Click here to review her year-by-year severance benefit.

Dr. Rand will use the loans from the hospital to purchase an indexed universal life policy. She is contractually obligated to repay the loans at retirement, and this puts the hospital in a cash flow neutral position as you can see below:

table 1 graph

Dr. Rand’s costs include the after tax cost of her payroll reduction plus the net cash flow for the loan interest due to the hospital, as follows:

table 2 graph

At the beginning of year 21, BAMC pays Dr. Rand the five years of compensation she has deferred ($500,000) as provided in the severance agreement, and Dr. Rand repay BAMC the outstanding loan balance of $500,000 due on the split dollar arrangement. She is out-of-pocket $225,000 in income tax on the $500,000 severance — just as she would have been had she received the $100,000 compensation in years one through five.

It has cost her $419,180 over the first 20 years and $225,000 in income tax at the beginning of year 21, a total of $644,180. What has she gained? She now owns the IUL outright and begins accessing its cash values via tax free, participating, policy loans of $120,000 a year.

Click here to view Dr. Rand’s Leveraged Deferred Compensation illustration. Her net values are illustrated in Columns (5), (6), (7), and (8) on Pages 3 – 5. And note on Page 9 that the arrangement provides her with a pre-tax equivalent rate of return of 15.24%. Be certain also to review Page 14 to see the interplay of bonuses and loan interest that determine her net cash flow relative to loan interest payments. It is assumed that the source of the bonus funds are from an overall annual bonus that Dr. Rand receives. For those wanting to eliminate this bonus arrangement, Dr. Rand may choose to pay the loan interest. In this case, her pre-tax equivalent rate of return reduces to a still substantial 13.80%.

Below is a graphic of her overall results:

Dr Rands LDC Illustration 60 year analysis

Note that Dr. Rand is illustrated receiving $4,800,000 in after tax cash flow from age 60 to 100 ($120,000 x 40 years) with residual value in the policy of $6,357,060.

Key question: Could she have improved those results by taking the $100,000 of compensation in years one through five, paid her $45,000 in taxes, and invested the resulting $55,000 each year over the first five years?

To calculate this, we need to compare all of Dr. Rand’s costs for the Leveraged Deferred Compensation ($644,180) with just the total of the after tax compensation she could invest if she takes the compensation ($55,000 x 5 = $275,000).

Let’s go to two corners of InsMark Systems that many of you don’t know exist.

Step 1.

Each of our executive-owned benefit plans allows you to export the executive’s share of the benefit plan to InsMark Source Data Storage. You can do this by clicking on this icon on the lower right of your benefit module’s Workbook Window while in edit mode:

Benefit Share image

Step 2.

One of the most popular modules we have for comparing alternatives is “Various Financial Alternatives”, located in the InsMark Illustration System. But that won’t work in this case because it only compares equal costs. A sister module to Various Financial Alternatives is “Other Investments vs. Your Policy” also located in the InsMark Illustration System.

We will import Dr. Rand’s share of the benefit plan noted in Step 1 into the Other Investments vs. Your Policy module by clicking on this prompt that appears on the lower right of this module’s Workbook Window while in edit mode and selecting the benefit data created in Step 1:

Source data image

That benefit data will now be resident in the Other Investments vs. Your Policy module which has a very useful prompt in the upper right corner of the Investment Detail tab that allows you to schedule completely different funding costs for the alternative investment:

Deposits to the investment image

If Dr. Rand invests the $55,000 in after tax funds in years one through five in an equity account, that account must furnish $120,000 in after tax cash flow from her age 60 to 100 with residual value of roughly $6.3 million at age 100 to compete with the Leveraged Deferred Compensation illustration. So we will use the “Schedule” prompt to input a $55,000 investment for five years with annual after tax withdrawals of $120,000 from age 60 to 100.

The assumptions we used for the equity account are (note that, due to the dividend, the overall yield is 100 basis points higher than the IUL):

Growth: 7.50%
Dividend: 1.00%
Sales Charge: 0%
Mgt. Fee: 0.75% (unusually low — most advisers charge 1.00% to 1.50%)
Income Tax: 45% (including a provision for state capital gains tax)
Capital Gains and Dividend Tax: 25% (including a provision for state taxes)
Realized Gains That Are Short-Term: 30% (generous)
Realized Gains That Are Long-Term: 70% (equally generous)
Portfolio Turnover: 10% (unusually low — assumes an index-type fund)

Below are the results of the comparison for Dr. Rand. Notice the shortfall in after tax cash flow from the equity account highlighted by the left side arrow due to the equity account running out of gas at her age 68.

comparison for Dr Rand LDC vs Equity Account number 1 image

Click here to view the full comparison illustration.

Some may say that the comparison should be between what the Leveraged Compensation Plan costs Dr. Rand and how those numbers compare when invested in the same equity account. That’s reasonable, so using the same equity account assumptions as above, those results are below.

Note: This time we selected this prompt:

Deposits to the investment image

Again we have a shortfall in after tax cash flow from the equity account highlighted by the left side arrow due to the equity account running out of gas at her age 76.

comparison for Dr Rand LDC vs Equity Account number 2 image

Click here to view the full comparison illustration.

How can the IUL work out so well? Two reasons:

1. Its participating loans create a significant amount of favorable interest rate arbitrage.

2. If you measure all the factors that can retard the growth of an equity account compared to what retards the growth of an IUL policy (mortality charges and expenses), the IUL will typically come out the winner every time — except over short term durations where the commission loads of the IUL have not had time to be absorbed.

Final Questions:

Will Leveraged Deferred Compensation work for any executive of a Tax Exempt Organization? Yes; however, in my opinion, it works best for senior executives of tax exempt organizations like hospitals, colleges and universities (think coaches), and other large charitable organizations.

Will Leveraged Deferred Compensation work for non-owner executives of any profit-making entity (C corporation, S corporation, LLC, Partnership, Sole Proprietorship)? Yes.

Will Leveraged Deferred Compensation work for owner-executives of C corporations? Yes.

Will Leveraged Deferred Compensation work for owner-executives of S corporations or member-executives of LLCs or partners of Partnerships? No, there would be no point in using it with a pass-through tax entity.

Tax Authority for Leveraged Deferred Compensation:

The funding mechanism of Leveraged Deferred Compensation is Loan-Based Split Dollar which is authorized by the 2003 Final Split Dollar Regulations (Treas. Reg. §§1.61-22, 1.83(e), 1.83-6(a)(5) and 1.7872-15). The fact that funding of the plan is assisted by an executive’s compensation reduction that is subsequently recovered by way of a valid severance agreement should be irrelevant.

In all cases, the approval of a client’s legal and tax advisers must be secured regarding the implementation or modification of this planning technique as well as the applicability and consequences of new cases, rulings, or legislation upon existing or impending plans.

Specimen Documents:

Specimen documents (including specimen severance agreements) are available for Leveraged Deferred Compensation in Version 21.0 (and higher) of InsMark’s Documents On A Disk™ under Key Employee Benefit Plans (in the Employer-Sponsored Split Dollar Plans section of documents).

For licensing information regarding the Leveraged Compensation System, the InsMark Illustration System, and Documents On A Disk™, contact Julie Nayeri at julien@insmark.com or 888-InsMark (467-6275). Institutional inquiries should be directed to David Grant, Senior Vice President – Sales, at dag@insmark.com or 925-543-0513.

InsMark’s Digital Workbook Files

If you would like some help creating customized versions of the presentations in this Blog for your clients, watch the video below on how to download and use InsMark’s Digital Workbook Files.

Digital Workbook Files For This Blog

Blog40.zip

Download all workbook files for all blogs

Note:  If you are viewing this on a cell phone or tablet, the downloaded Workbook file won’t launch in your InsMark System.  Please forward the Workbook where you can launch it on your PC where your InsMark System(s) are installed.

InsMark’s Referral Resources
(Put our Illustration Experts to Work for Your Practice)

We created Referral Resources to deliver a “do-it-for-me” illustration service in a way that makes sense for your practice. You can utilize your choice of insurance company, there is no commission split, and you don’t have to change any current relationships. They are very familiar with running InsMark software.

Please mention my name when you talk to a Referral Resource as they have promised to take special care of my readers. My only request is this: if a Referral Resource helps you get the sale, place at least that case through them; otherwise, you will be taking unfair advantage of their generous offer to InsMark licensees.

Save time and get results with any InsMark illustration.  Contact:

Testimonial:

“Thanks to the genius of Bob Ritter and InsMark, I was able to complete two cases in the last few months using the InsMark Leveraged Compensation System. Annual premiums total was over $90,000. Before reaching out to Bob, I struggled with conceptualizing and communicating this new deferred compensation logic to the business owners and their key employees. With the InsMark software, the compelling case logic was immediately obvious to everyone. In addition, the software is easy to learn and use.”
Glenn A. Main III, InsMark Power Producer, The Main Point LP, Pittsburgh, PA

separator image

More Recent Articles:

Blog #39: More on the Magic of Indexed Universal Life

Blog #38: Avoiding a $20 Million Mistake

Blog #37: Four Ways to Smite a Termite

Blog #36: The Magic of Indexed Universal Life

Blog #35: Revisiting the Pothole in Wealth Planning (Good Logic vs. Bad Logic™)

3 Reasons Why It’s Profitable For You To Share These
Blog Posts With Your Business Associates and
Professional Study Groups (i.e. “LinkedIn”)

Robert B. Ritter, Jr. Blog Archive

 

4 thoughts on “Blog #40: Leveraged Deferred Compensation

  • April 16, 2014 at 11:58 am
    Permalink

    “Hi Bob,

    Blog #40 is so powerful it makes me want to go back into production.

    You must have the majority of big producers lapping at your coattails.

    Bill Clarkson”

    Hi Bill,

    Wow! That’s a nice thing to hear.

    Thanks for letting me know your thoughts, and why not get back into production? (You’re too young to be retired.)

    Thanks for commenting.

    Bob Ritter

    Reply
  • February 27, 2014 at 7:15 pm
    Permalink

    “Hi Bob,

    What are the issues that might surface when the Leveraged Deferred Compensation Plan for an employee is presented to a tax exempt organization like a hospital?

    Thanks,

    Tom”

    ————————

    Hi Tom,

    Below are some considerations a Tax Exempt Organization (“TEO”) might have regarding Leveraged Deferred Compensation (“LDC”).

    Does LDC involve a “disqualified person” participating in an “excess benefit” transaction?  A disqualified person generally is any person in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the public charity (e.g., officers, directors, or trustees) at any time in the five-year period before the excess benefit transaction occurred.  An excess benefit transaction is one that arises when the overall compensation and benefit package is deemed to be unreasonable.  That, coupled with a disqualified person, means that LDC for such an individual should be avoided.

    If the TEO’s employee has a compensation package that is not considered to be an excess benefit transaction, will the deferral of a portion of that compensation create an excess benefit transaction?  There is no reason to believe it will.

    If the TEO also agrees to enter into a bona fide loan regime split dollar plan (as authorized by the 2003 Final Split Dollar Regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury Department) in which the employee is contractually obligated to repay the loans extended for premium payments, will that, when coupled with the balance of the other benefits and compensation, create an excess benefit transaction?  There is no reason to believe it will assuming the annual loans are substantially equal to the compensation being deferred (as is the case with LDC), and repayment is secured and legally enforceable.

    Will the presence of a severance plan in an amount equal to the compensation reduction add to the likelihood of the overall compensation package being classified as an excess benefit transaction?  There is no reason to believe it will if the severance merely recovers the prior compensation reduction.

    If a doctor and a non-profit hospital enter into a LDC arrangement, do the Medicare-Medicaid Anti-KickBack and Stark II rules apply?  There is no reason to believe they will if the doctor is an employee of the hospital with no other independent relationship with hospital.

    Click here   for a file named “Unreasonable Compensation – Tax Exempt Organizations.pdf” for a report from our legal counsel on the LDC transaction as it relates to a tax exempt organization.  Click here  for a file named “Severance Arrangements and Tax Exempt Organizations.pdf”.

    Thanks for commenting , Tom.

    Bob Ritter

    InsMark, Inc.

    Important Note:  This information is for educational purposes only.  In all cases, the approval of a client’s legal and tax advisers must be secured regarding the implementation or modification of any planning technique as well as the applicability and consequences of new cases, rulings, or legislation upon existing or impending plans.

    IRS Circular 230 Disclosure

    Any tax advice contained in this presentation (including any attachments or referred material) was not intended, or written to be used, and cannot be used by you or any other person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.

    Reply
  • February 18, 2014 at 7:13 pm
    Permalink

    Bob,

    Several years ago the President/CEO of a nonprofit regional hospital was approached with a similar plan. Tax and legal concluded that loans were an excess benefit transaction at IRC section 4958 where the penalties are onerous. This applied to a “disqualified person.” Dr Rand may not be a disqualified person; however, a one could qualify if they are highly compensated.
    Part IV Line 26 on Form 990 asks “Was a loan to or by a current officer, director, trustee, key employee, highly compensated employee or disqualified person outstanding as of the end of the organization’s tax year?” If yes complete schedule L.
    What we would need is a clear explanation on why this split dollar loan would not be an “excess benefit transaction” and instruction on how the Form 990 is to be completed.

    Reply
    • June 27, 2014 at 3:16 pm
      Permalink

      Hi Steve,

      I find it difficult to respond specifically to your Comment with no details about the plan you reference other than it is “similar” to the plan for Dr. Rand outlined in Blog #40: Leveraged Deferred Compensation. The fact that one set of advisers found what you refer to as a “similar” transaction to be an excess benefit transaction is not particularly instructive.  That said, I will try to respond to your comment. 

      Click here for a report from our legal counsel on the transaction for Dr. Rand as it relates to a tax exempt organization (TEO). 

      Form 990 should present no problems.  Part IV Line 26 on Form 990 should be answered Yes.  If you link to http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f990sl.pdf, you will find that the referenced Schedule L (Part II – Line (1)) is straightforward relative to the loan made by the TEO to Dr. Rand.   I would think that the “Purpose of the Loan” section should reflect something like “In accordance with a loan regime split dollar agreement”, although counsel may prefer entirely different wording.

      The fact that the TEO and Dr. Rand decide to enter into a loan regime split dollar agreement should not be an issue — at least in the amounts illustrated for Dr. Rand.  The fact that Dr. Rand reduces compensation by $100,000 a year each year for five years in exchange for a severance agreement should also not be an issue provided the severance agreement is properly drafted.  Although it was included in the Blog, click here for a report on the severance agreement.

      InsMark’s Documents On A Disk (Version 21.0 and higher), has comprehensive specimen documentation for Dr. Rand’s arrangement. 

      I hope this helps, Steve, and thanks for taking the time to comment.

      Best regards,

      Bob Ritter

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *